adicheo

indian

4 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author, Miles Mathis, argues that the sinking of the USS Indianapolis and the Battle of Iwo Jima were faked, akin to other historical events he claims have been fabricated, such as the Titanic sinking. Mathis’s skepticism about the USS Indianapolis’s sinking was triggered by its inclusion in the movie Jaws, written by John Milius. Mathis suggests Milius, whom he labels a “major spook” with supposed military connections and a Jewish heritage from prominent families like Cohen and Neumann, intentionally included the story as propaganda to sell the bombing of Japan.

Mathis questions the official narrative of the USS Indianapolis sinking, focusing on Captain Charles B. McVay III. He notes the similarity in pronunciation to Tim McVeigh and points out alleged inconsistencies in McVeigh’s biographical information. Mathis finds it suspicious that McVay III, who was the Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) and head of Allied Intelligence during WWII, was captaining a cruiser. He argues that such a high-ranking intelligence official would not have been placed in such a vulnerable position, especially without escort and with communication failures. Mathis also disputes the reasons given for the lack of distress signals, highlighting the changing official stories and the implausibility of key individuals ignoring SOS calls.

Further doubt is cast on the Indianapolis’s mission by the author’s assertion that transporting enriched uranium by ship to Tinian Island was less safe and slower than flying it. Mathis questions the denial of a destroyer escort, arguing that McVay III, as head of JIC, could have ordered one. He also expresses disbelief at the idea that the Indianapolis, a former flagship of Admiral Raymond Spruance, would be an outdated vessel lacking submarine-detecting radar.

Mathis also scrutinizes the discovery of the USS Indianapolis wreckage in 2017, funded by Paul Allen. He claims the images are CGI and staged, citing the ship’s upright position, intact paint, and the unrealistic lighting and seafloor depicted. He further argues that the shadow in one image is inconsistent with a light source at that depth and that the model does not match the actual ship’s appearance. Comparing a 1939 image with a 1945 image, Mathis suggests the ship’s appearance and the supposed refitting are inconsistent and possibly fabricated. He also questions the necessity of two overhauls in the same year and a major refit for carrying a single canister of uranium.

The author then shifts his focus to the Battle of Iwo Jima, which he also claims was faked. He disputes the casualty figures and the scale of the US forces involved, arguing that a blockade would have been sufficient given the alleged starvation of Japanese soldiers. He suggests that Japan had already surrendered and that the Pacific War itself might have been fabricated for financial reasons, with Japan being complicit. Mathis points to General Obata’s convenient absence during the initial US attack and his subsequent “harakiri” on a date he claims is significant (“aces and eights, Chai”). He also questions the background and rapid promotions of General Kuribayashi, who allegedly faked his death on Iwo Jima, and Marine General Graves Erskine, noting his family’s connections to Scottish nobility and his own seemingly unearned promotions and “spook” activities. The author concludes by urging readers to research Kuribayashi’s Wikipedia page and other mainstream accounts of these battles, asserting they will reveal the fabricated nature of these historical events.

Here is the list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc.:

Graph View