adicheo

henrygay

7 min read

This document, “Henry VIII was Gay” by Miles Mathis, argues that Henry VIII was homosexual, reframing his marital history and political actions through this lens. The author suggests that the historical narratives surrounding Henry VIII’s wives, particularly the alleged reasons for their divorces or executions, are fabrications designed to conceal his true sexual orientation. Mathis posits that Henry VIII’s marriages were either non-consummated or served as political expediency, with many of his actions, such as the break with Rome and the dissolution of monasteries, being orchestrated by the Stanley family to seize wealth.

The author reinterprets various historical details, including a painting of a young Henry VIII, the marriage to Catherine of Aragon, the supposed lack of portraits of Catherine of Aragon, the marriages to Katherine Parr, Anne of Cleves, Katherine Howard, and Jane Seymour, and the limited number of acknowledged mistresses (Hastings, Blount). A significant portion of the essay focuses on the theory that Elizabeth I was actually Henry Fitzroy, Henry VIII’s illegitimate son with Elizabeth Blount, and that Henry Fitzroy lived as a woman for decades. This theory is supported by alleged resemblances between Elizabeth I and Henry Fitzroy, similarities in their health issues (hair loss), and discrepancies in their birth and death dates, suggesting a prolonged cover-up.

Mathis also critiques the work of other historians and writers, like Bram Stoker, suggesting their theories are either flawed or deliberate misdirections. He claims that powerful groups, referred to as Phoenicians and linked to families like the Medici and Komnenes, have historically manipulated events and narratives, including the Avignon Schism and the dissolution of monasteries, to consolidate power and wealth, ultimately leading to a “New World Order” characterized by secularization and corporatocracy. The author believes that the seemingly inexplicable aspects of Henry VIII’s reign, such as his marital choices and the political machinations, become clear when viewed through the prism of his alleged homosexuality and the orchestrated deception by powerful families.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. from the text, marked with double square brackets:

This document, “Henry VIII was Gay” by Miles Mathis, argues that Henry VIII was homosexual, reframing his marital history and political actions through this lens. The author suggests that the historical narratives surrounding Henry VIII’s wives, particularly the alleged reasons for their divorces or executions, are fabrications designed to conceal his true sexual orientation. Mathis posits that Henry VIII’s marriages were either non-consummated or served as political expediency, with many of his actions, such as the break with Rome and the dissolution of monasteries, being orchestrated by the Stanley family to seize wealth.

The author reinterprets various historical details, including a painting of a young Henry VIII, the marriage to Catherine of Aragon, the supposed lack of portraits of Catherine of Aragon, the marriages to Katherine Parr, Anne of Cleves, Katherine Howard, and Jane Seymour, and the limited number of acknowledged mistresses (Hastings, Blount). A significant portion of the essay focuses on the theory that Elizabeth I was actually Henry Fitzroy, Henry VIII’s illegitimate son with Elizabeth Blount, and that Henry Fitzroy lived as a woman for decades. This theory is supported by alleged resemblances between Elizabeth I and Henry Fitzroy, similarities in their health issues (hair loss), and discrepancies in their birth and death dates, suggesting a prolonged cover-up.

Mathis also critiques the work of other historians and writers, like Bram Stoker, suggesting their theories are either flawed or deliberate misdirections. He claims that powerful groups, referred to as Phoenicians and linked to families like the Medici and Komnenes, have historically manipulated events and narratives, including the Avignon Schism and the dissolution of monasteries, to consolidate power and wealth, ultimately leading to a “New World Order” characterized by secularization and corporatocracy. The author believes that the seemingly inexplicable aspects of Henry VIII’s reign, such as his marital choices and the political machinations, become clear when viewed through the prism of his alleged homosexuality and the orchestrated deception by powerful families.

Summary with Marked Entities:

This document, “Henry VIII was Gay” by Miles Mathis, argues that Henry VIII was homosexual, reframing his marital history and political actions through this lens. The author suggests that the historical narratives surrounding Henry VIII’s wives, particularly the alleged reasons for their divorces or executions, are fabrications designed to conceal his true sexual orientation. Mathis posits that Henry VIII’s marriages were either non-consummated or served as political expediency, with many of his actions, such as the break with Rome and the dissolution of monasteries, being orchestrated by the Stanley family to seize wealth.

The author reinterprets various historical details, including a painting of a young Henry VIII, the marriage to Catherine of Aragon, the supposed lack of portraits of Catherine of Aragon, the marriages to Katherine Parr, Anne of Cleves, Katherine Howard, and Jane Seymour, and the limited number of acknowledged mistresses (Hastings, Blount). A significant portion of the essay focuses on the theory that Elizabeth I was actually Henry Fitzroy, Henry VIII’s illegitimate son with Elizabeth Blount, and that Henry Fitzroy lived as a woman for decades. This theory is supported by alleged resemblances between Elizabeth I and Henry Fitzroy, similarities in their health issues (hair loss), and discrepancies in their birth and death dates, suggesting a prolonged cover-up.

Mathis also critiques the work of other historians and writers, like Bram Stoker, suggesting their theories are either flawed or deliberate misdirections. He claims that powerful groups, referred to as Phoenicians and linked to families like the Medici and Komnenes, have historically manipulated events and narratives, including the Avignon Schism and the dissolution of monasteries, to consolidate power and wealth, ultimately leading to a “New World Order” characterized by secularization and corporatocracy. The author believes that the seemingly inexplicable aspects of Henry VIII’s reign, such as his marital choices and the political machinations, become clear when viewed through the prism of his alleged homosexuality and the orchestrated deception by powerful families.

List of Marked Entities:

Graph View