adicheo

heisen

6 min read

This article by Miles Mathis argues that Werner Heisenberg was a fraud, not for outright fabrication but for being misrepresented as a genius. Mathis claims that Heisenberg’s Nobel Prize was for work he didn’t do at age 24, and that Born and Jordan should have shared the award. The author delves into Heisenberg’s family background, suggesting hidden Jewish and Phoenician roots, citing his father’s connections to Byzantium and Russia, and his mother’s purported ties to Russia and Scientist. Mathis also questions Heisenberg’s rapid academic advancement, his doctoral dissertation topic, and his quick attainment of habilitation. The article scrutinizes Heisenberg’s famous quantum mechanics paper, calling the core of it “garbage” and attributing any merit to the appendix by Born and Jordan. Mathis suggests Heisenberg’s work was a deliberate attempt to make physics incomprehensible, supported by the Rockefeller Foundation to facilitate financial exploitation. The author contrasts Heisenberg with Erwin Schrodinger, asserting Heisenberg was promoted to bury Schrodinger’s reputation, even through fabricated accusations of pedophilia. Mathis then refutes Heisenberg’s contributions to the Zeeman Effect, ferromagnetism, and the positron, presenting his own theories based on a charge field model and nucleus diagrams. He also dismisses Heisenberg’s work on the nucleus and his alleged involvement in the Nazi bomb program, which he characterizes as a fabricated spectacle. Finally, Mathis critiques Heisenberg’s post-war directorship of the Max Planck Institute, deeming his research unproductive and his involvement with UNESCO and particle accelerators like CERN as contributing to massive financial waste without fundamental scientific advancement.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. from the text:

People:

Places:

Organizations/Institutions:

Concepts/Theories/Principles:

Graph View