Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:
The author Miles Mathis argues that the story of Arizona divesting from Ben and Jerry’s due to a boycott of Israel is “fake news” orchestrated by entities like the CIA. He claims that the founders, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, are Jewish and that their family, the Cohens, is influential in historical “fakes.” The author asserts that Ben and Jerry’s was sold to Unilever 21 years ago, and Unilever, not the founders, makes business decisions. He dismisses Arizona’s claim of divestment as meaningless and unprovable, suggesting Arizona is not invested in Ben and Jerry’s directly, but possibly in Unilever, and would have to divest from the parent company. Mathis proposes that such activism is a tactic by a “Cabal” to “control the opposition” and create the illusion of action without achieving any real change, comparing it to Noam Chomsky’s approach. He further criticizes Arizona’s role as a “policeman for Israel” and views the state’s actions as censorship and an attempt to prevent criticism of nations.
The author then pivots to discuss Rand Paul’s comments about Dr. Anthony Fauci needing to be charged with perjury for lying to Congress. Mathis contends that Paul is also “controlling the opposition” and that Fauci’s alleged perjury is a minor offense compared to potential charges of “mass murder and treason.” He criticizes media outlets like Tucker Carlson, Infowars, Zerohedge, Breitbart, NaturalNews, and Gateway Pundit for focusing on manufactured events like the withdrawal from Afghanistan instead of issues like “masks, vaccines, censorship, and fighting tyranny.” He suggests these outlets are “controlled opposition” for giving time to the Afghanistan narrative, calling it a “diversion.” He also claims the January 6th Capitol events were a “fake insurrection” and that reports of people being in solitary confinement are untrue, suggesting Alex Jones has forgotten how “provocateured false flags” work, perhaps due to the Sandy Hook judgment.
Mathis questions the logic of skyrocketing prices and stock markets during a depression, suggesting it’s due to money stolen by the “top 5%” or fabricated market numbers used to justify price gouging. He dismisses government programs like rent and wage mitigation as simply printing or borrowing money that taxpayers will have to repay with interest, creating “debt slaves.” He argues that the wealthy are increasingly targeting each other’s money, leading to a “Civil War” among billionaires and trillionaires, which they attempt to obscure by manufacturing divisions among the populace (“red v. blue, man v. woman, black v. white, gay v. straight, old v. young”). The author believes this is a historic moment where people are more aware of the world’s workings and the “lies of the rulers,” with a growing number of “awake” individuals, particularly in the US and Europe. He urges people to seize this opportunity to “take them down” before the rulers “close those openings.”