adicheo

eingen

6 min read

This article, “Einstein’s Genealogy” by Miles Mathis, discusses the author’s research into the ancestry and personal life of Albert Einstein. Mathis begins by thanking his patrons and explaining his resistance to platforms like Patreon due to fees, promoting direct payment via personal checks. He also mentions selling restored antique bikes and 19th-century books as tangible support.

The author then turns his attention to Einstein, whom he considers the most famous person he hasn’t yet scrutinized. While Einstein’s theories of Relativity are deemed fundamentally true but “vastly oversold” with garbled mainstream interpretations, Mathis doesn’t believe Einstein was a complete fraud or plagiarist. Instead, he suggests Einstein was a mediocre mathematician promoted beyond his abilities by powerful groups, possibly the Families. Mathis argues that Einstein resisted the later “Operation Chaos” use of his theories and his debates with Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg show his earnest opposition to their interpretations of quantum mechanics, which Mathis considers more damaging.

The core of the article delves into Einstein’s familial connections, revealing extensive intermarriage within prominent families. His mother was a Koch, related to Charles Koch. Einstein was also a Weil, Bernheimer, Moos, Schmal, Sontheimer, Juda, Hajim, and Katz. His 2g-grandmother was Judith Mayer Hill, whose name is obscured in genealogical records, suggesting a link to Hitler (who Mathis claims was a Hildesheim). The author also notes a possible connection to Walter Koch, a physicist associated with the Beatles.

Further tracing Einstein’s paternal Moos line, he is linked to a Kohn and a Bel, and a Heilbronner, possibly connecting him to mathematical historian Johan Heilbronner, who was also born in Ulm, Einstein’s birthplace.

The article questions Einstein’s sexuality due to his second wife, Elsa Einstein, being his first cousin. Elsa’s parents were Rudolf Einstein and Fanny Koch, and Albert’s parents were Hermann Einstein and Pauline Koch, making Fanny and Pauline sisters. This cousin marriage is presented as a common practice among famous Jewish individuals, often serving as a “beard relationship.” Einstein is also revealed to be related to Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Richard Dreyfuss, and Alfred Dreyfus through his aunt Jette marrying Moses Dreyfuss. The Dreyfus family lineage is traced to Alsace and Baden-Wurttemberg, and includes connections to the Guggenheim and Bayer families, as well as Louis Dreyfus Group.

Einstein’s first wife, Mileva Maric, is presented not as a nobody from Serbia, but as having a Serbian name equivalent to Mark or Marx, and from a wealthy family connected to the Austro-Hungarian monarchy’s royal court under Franz Joseph. Mathis asserts that Jews held significant economic power in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, suggesting the Habsburgs were also Jewish. The article highlights that Mileva Maric received all the Nobel Prize money in 1922, while Einstein only got the medal, which Mathis argues doesn’t make sense as a divorce settlement unless Mileva was from a prominent family and collaborated significantly on Relativity. He believes Mileva co-authored the papers, or at least assisted with the math and sold her byline to Einstein for a substantial fee, citing her original credit on the manuscript before it was removed for publication in Annalen der Physik.

Einstein’s third companion, Betty Neumann, is shown to have maternal connections to the Kann and Kohn families, another cousin marriage. She was also a Schweitzer and related to Hoffman, Rosenberg, and Mayer families. Betty’s aunt married Alexander Rosenberg, possibly linking to Alfred Rosenberg, a bankroller of the Nazis. This may also connect to John von Neumann, whose family was from Hungary and closely related to Kohns.

The author concludes by reiterating his lack of interest in Einstein’s sexual orientation, but uses it to question the narrative of famous men as womanizers when their relationships are primarily with cousins. He asserts that Einstein was not an actor, did not fake his death, and that Relativity, despite later misuse in “Operation Chaos,” was initially real science. Mathis laments the state of 20th-century physics, claiming it has been corrupted by industry and powerful families, leading to a “mini Dark Age” of “brute authority and cloaking mysticism,” with a decline in theoretical understanding since the 19th century.

Summary:

This article by Miles Mathis explores the genealogical connections of Albert Einstein, arguing that Einstein was not a fraud but a product of powerful familial networks. Mathis posits that while Einstein’s Relativity theory is fundamentally true, its mainstream interpretation is flawed and it was later co-opted for manipulative purposes. The author details extensive intermarriage within Einstein’s family, linking him to prominent names like Koch, Weil, Bernheimer, Moos, Schmal, Sontheimer, Juda, Hajim, Katz, Hildesheim, Kohn, Bel, Heilbronner, Dreyfuss, Guggenheim, Bayer, Louis Dreyfus Group, Kann, Schweitzer, Hoffman, Rosenberg, Mayer, and potentially Alfred Rosenberg and John von Neumann. The article also investigates Einstein’s first wife, Mileva Maric, suggesting she was from a notable Jewish family, possibly a Marx descendant, and was a significant collaborator on Relativity, evidenced by her receiving the Nobel Prize money. Mathis criticizes the decline of genuine scientific inquiry in the 20th century, attributing it to industrial and familial control that prioritizes profit over truth, contrasting it with the more robust scientific environment of the 19th century.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View