Here’s a summary of the provided text, with the requested elements marked:
The article Miles Mathis disputes the NOAA prediction that there will be no sunspot Cycle 26. The author claims that NOAA’s chart, which predicts sunspots remaining low until 2040, is designed to spread fear, possibly at the behest of the Air Force. Mathis asserts that his own predictions are more accurate, with Cycle 25 expected to have a second peak in late 2026 and Cycle 26 being the largest since the 1950s. He accuses the Air Force of deliberately miscounting sunspots for several years to hide the fact that they align with his predictions, not NOAA’s. Mathis also criticizes NOAA’s predictions for Cycle 25 as being “lopsided” and based on stolen data and fabricated numbers. He suggests that NOAA’s controllers at the Air Force are making up the numbers. Mathis reiterates that the actual sunspot numbers are higher than NOAA reports, and he attributes this discrepancy to the Air Force using various tricks to manipulate the data. He also mentions that Mike Adams at NaturalNews and other outlets continued to push the “grand solar minimum” narrative into 2022. Mathis believes that planetary conjunctions cause solar cycles, a theory NOAA does not possess. He concludes that NOAA’s current predictions are a sign of panic and disarray.
List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.: