adicheo

chom3

4 min read

This article criticizes Noam Chomsky’s current relevance and intellectual output, arguing he is out of touch and still operating on outdated information. The author Miles Mathis contends that Chomsky, once a prominent intellectual, is now a “cog in the Jewish propaganda machine” and that his influence has waned since 11. The piece scrutinizes a recent interview Chomsky gave on RT, claiming Chomsky promotes “fear porn” and “Jewish eschatology” by discussing existential threats like nuclear war and climate destruction.

The author contrasts Chomsky’s views with those of John Kerry, who allegedly spoke of needing vast sums of money, and dismisses the threat of nuclear war as manufactured, comparing Putin to a fictional character. Chomsky is accused of intentionally scaring “Gentiles” to benefit his “masters” who steal from global treasuries. The article also criticizes Infowars for promoting similar fear-mongering.

The interview is further analyzed for Chomsky’s comments on journalist deaths, the UN, and the case of Julian Assange. The author dismisses Chomsky’s portrayal of Assange as a victim, labeling him an “Intel actor.” Chomsky’s defense of the Espionage Act of 1917 and his perceived lifelong promotion by mainstream media are questioned.

The core of Mathis’s argument is that Chomsky is living in a “make-believe world,” out of sync with current realities like rising fascism since 2001. Chomsky’s defense of debate and comparison of contemporary media to the 1970s is deemed inaccurate, with Mathis asserting that censorship is now more overt. The author believes Chomsky aligns with the CFR and that his current role is to pacify his remaining supporters.

The article critiques Chomsky’s comparisons of the Iraq War and the Ukraine crisis, arguing both are staged to enrich the military-industrial complex. Mathis expresses skepticism about the interview ever touching “solid ground” due to Chomsky’s alleged participation in a “Matrix of distortion.”

A significant portion of the text delves into the history of the Doomsday Clock, its founders, and the purported origins of the nuclear chain reaction, questioning the scientific contributions and backgrounds of individuals like Leo Szilard, Eugene Rabinowitch, John Simpson, and Hyman Goldsmith. The author suggests that H. G. Wells’s fiction may have inspired Szilard’s ideas, and explores alleged connections between Wells, Margaret Sanger, Maxim Gorky, Joseph Conrad, Alex Svartsman, and the Milne family, including Field Marshall George Milne and A. A. Milne.

The article concludes by reiterating Chomsky’s focus on existential threats and the loss of rational debate, while asserting that 11 was the event that pierced his “bubble of naivete.” Mathis views Chomsky’s current efforts as a failed attempt to re-establish his former influence.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View