adicheo

bonhoef

7 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

This article, by David Kassady, presents a radical reinterpretation of historical events, particularly concerning Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The author asserts that Hitler was a gay Jewish actor, and that top Nazis like Goebbels, Eichmann, Himmler, and Rommel were also Jewish. The Beer Hall Putsch and the Night of the Long Knives are claimed to have been faked, as were the Nuremberg Trials. The author positions this as continuing the research of someone named Miles.

The text then focuses on Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a German Lutheran pastor and theologian who co-founded the Confessing Church to resist Nazi control over churches. He is alleged to have been an agent for Abwehr (Nazi Military Intelligence) and involved in the failed July 20 Plot to assassinate Hitler, known as Operation Valkyrie, which led to his execution at Flossenburg concentration camp in 1945. The author suggests this narrative of an anti-Nazi pastor becoming a double agent is implausible, arguing that intelligence agencies serve to suppress democratic revolutions through staged events like fake revolutions and assassinations. Bonhoeffer and the Confessing Church are characterized as “controlled opposition” designed to thwart genuine resistance.

The author delves into Bonhoeffer’s family history, highlighting his aristocratic lineage, including his father Karl Bonhoeffer (a psychologist and neurologist), mother von Hase, and ancestors like Karl August von Hase and Stanislaus von Kalckreuth. These aristocratic ties are used to suggest Bonhoeffer had advantages and that his theological accomplishments are exaggerated. The author also points to numerous aristocratic family names linked to Bonhoeffer, such as von Stechows, von Moriens, von Rohds, von Wallenrodts, von Wartenburgs, and von Bulows, drawing connections to figures like Bernard, Prince von Bulow, Otto von Bulow, Georg von Bulow, Karl Max Bulowius, and Claus von Bulow. Further connections are made to Franz Wilhelm, Count von Wartenberg (a Jesuit Cardinal), and various surnames on both his maternal and paternal sides, which the author interprets as probable Jewish names. The author notes Bonhoeffer was a twin and suggests this relates to Phoenician symbolism.

Bonhoeffer’s extended family connections are elaborated, including his brothers-in-law von Dohnanyi and Rudiger Schleicher, and his aunt von Funck. His fiancée, Maria von Wedemeyer, is linked to Ruth von Kleist-Retzow, von Rohr, and ultimately to Swedish and Finnish nobility and Prussian politicians. The von Dohnanyis connect him to composer Ernst von Dohnanyi, who studied under Istvan Thoman (a student of Franz Liszt), and Hans von Koessler (a cousin of Max Reger). Bonhoeffer is also linked to Ewald-Heinrich von Kleist-Schmenzin and the historian Christian Gerlach, who questioned the sincerity of the July 20 Plot.

The author discusses Ewald von Kleist, a plotter who allegedly escaped punishment, and his founding of the Munich Conference on Security Policy, attended by figures like Henry Kissinger, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin, and George Soros. Bonhoeffer’s aunt, von Funck, is linked to von Blombergs (including Werner von Blomberg, Hitler’s first Minister of War) and von Lacys, who were connected to the Stuarts, thus linking Bonhoeffer to Hitler’s nephew, Stuart-Houston.

Bonhoeffer’s return to Germany in 1931 and his role as a “youth secretary” for the World Alliance for Promoting International Friendship through the Churches are mentioned, with the author questioning the nature of this role. The article suggests Bonhoeffer was gay and that his alleged death was faked to escape his public life and embrace his homosexuality, citing author Charles Marsh and his biography Strange Glory, which claims Bonhoeffer was in love with his student Eberhard Bethge.

The author re-examines Bonhoeffer’s 1933 radio address attacking Hitler, questioning why a 27-year-old with no notable achievements would be given such a platform, and how he later became an intelligence agent for the Nazis without scrutiny. The author posits that Bonhoeffer was recruited at Humboldt University, a supposed hub for “cloaked agents” and “false luminaries” like Marx, Engels, Weber, Hegel, Schopenhauer, and von Braun.

Martin Niemoller, co-founder of the Confessing Church, is also scrutinized. His full name, Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niemoller, is presented as indicative of “cloaked nobility.” Niemoller’s alleged antisemitism and Nazi support, followed by a sudden switch, are dismissed as a facade. His escape from concentration camps and subsequent activism are framed as evidence of his role in “controlled opposition.” The author also speculates about Niemoller’s family, suggesting a connection to the von Wrede family and potentially to Bonhoeffer himself through shared Finnish-Swedish nobility.

The text links Bonhoeffer to Paul von Schleicher, the Chancellor preceding Hitler, suggesting Hitler’s assassination of von Schleicher was faked, with Goebbels’ involvement implying they were all part of the same deception.

The July 20 Plot is further debunked. The author criticizes the photographic evidence of the bombing at the Wolf’s Lair, finding no signs of an explosion and suggesting the damage was caused by demolition. The account of Claus von Stauffenberg’s briefcase bomb and Colonel Heinz Brandt moving it, leading to Hitler’s survival and a stenographer’s death, is deemed implausible. The discrepancy in the blast’s effect on people versus the supposed protection of a table leg, and the lack of visible doors or windows in the depicted room, are questioned. The author also doubts the authenticity of Hitler’s trousers shown after the explosion, stating they are too large for his described physique. The author dismisses the idea that Hitler’s bulletproof vest prevented him from being shot, questioning the security measures around him.

Claus Philipp Maria Justinian Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg is identified as a high-ranking noble, with “Schenk” interpreted as a predominantly Jewish surname linked to the role of royal cupbearer. An ancestor, Johann Franz, Prince-Bishop of Constance and Augsburg, is presented with a prominent nose as further proof. Von Stauffenberg’s mother, von Uxkull-Gyllenband, links him to the same noble families as Bonhoeffer, including the von Funcks, von Lacys, and Stuarts, thus connecting von Stauffenberg to Hitler.

The author concludes that everyone involved in the July 20 Plot was “crypto-Jewish nobility” from ruling aristocratic families. The author argues that this contradicts the idea of Hitler leading a populist movement against the old aristocracy, suggesting the plot was a fabricated attempt by the “aristocratic old guard” to regain power, or a form of “controlled opposition” to maintain public trust in these elites.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View